Snakes on a Blog
Snakes on Borat
October 25th, 2006 at 9:00 pm

Ok, well, not really.  There’s no direct connection between Borat and Snakes on a Plane.  Borat is made by Fox, not New Line.  Borat is about a foreigner, not snakes.  Borat stars a British comedian, not Samuel L. Jackson.

What they do have in common, however, is underground appeal.  And Fox seems as though they’re trying to rectify some of the perceived problems with New Line’s handling of Snakes on a Plane:

Fox had hoped to open “Borat” in more than 2,000 theaters. Instead, the film will start in about 800 locations, then expand to 2,200 the following weekend when Fox hopes the movie will have gained traction. “The movie plays like a concert,” Snyder said. “It’s great in a theater.”

The movie also could be suffering from what one executive called “Snakes on a Plane” syndrome — buzz that peaks too early. After a year of Internet hype, “Snakes” had a disappointing opening this summer for New Line Cinema. Still, that movie was being hyped sight unseen, whereas critics have raved about “Borat.”

“It’s gotten a lot of publicity, but publicity does not necessarily equal an audience,” said analyst Brandon Gray, head of BoxOfficeMojo.com.

BoingBoing thinks so too:

But all that’s changed now. And between Borat’s MySpace hijinks, the tons and tons of looks-like-homemade promo videos… this is the first big-studio movie to really nail online viral promotion perfectly. How smart was Fox? MySpace, which Fox bought for $580 million, doing online street promotion for Borat, a Fox property… this is no “Snakes on a Plane” accident.

Will Borat succeed beyond the financial success of Snakes on a Plane?   (Ha, even BoxOfficeMojo thinks SoaP is like Borat.)



3 Comments »

to be honest i think theres no similarities whatsoever. the whole point of soap was that unlike the blair witch project and now Borat the hype wasn’t started by the filmmakers but the filmgoers because of the amazingness of the title.

Comment by Supersnake — October 26, 2006 @ 9:10 am

I am suprised that they are still saying that with the hype Hollywood was disappointed by the opening numbers of Snakes on a Plane. I mean don’t get me wrong I love the film. “Buy it on DVD January 2, 2007″ ,But come on did you really think it was going to do Titanic or Lord of the Rings numbers no. Without the fan hype it

1. would not have premiered at the Chinese Theater
2. would not have been called Snakes on a Plane
3. would not have made 15 million in its first weekend
4. would not have the line muthrf*ckn snakes on a muthrf*ckn plane

That’s about all I got to argue my case, but still with out Sam Jackson and the internet hypers this film would have opened limited and went to video by November.

So, please New Line and Hollywood quit with the we were disappointed.

Comment by Will — October 26, 2006 @ 9:29 am

HOW DARE THEY SAY “SNAKES ON A PLANE” and “ACCIDENT” IN THE SAME SENTENCE! SNAKES ON A PLANE WAS CONCEIVED BY GOD! AND GOD DOES NOT MAKE “ACCIDENTS’!

Comment by BojacRedleif — October 26, 2006 @ 1:11 pm


Leave a comment

Snakes on a What?
Snakes on a Blog documents my quest to attend the Hollywood premiere of Snakes on a Plane. If I'm really lucky, this blog will do more than just document the quest, it will aid it. Read my first and second pleas.

If you want to learn more about Snakes on a Plane, start at the beginning of January and read up.

Search

 
countdown


Quotes
"See, I will send venomous snakes among you, vipers that cannot be charmed, and they will bite you..."
                 - Jeremiah 8:17

"That's great, it starts with an earthquake, birds and snakes, an aeroplane..."
                 - Michael Stipe, REM

"Enough is enough, I've had it with these snakes."
                 - Samuel L. Jackson