Snakes on a Blog
Snakes on a Novelization Review
July 10th, 2006 at 12:02 am

As I mentioned previously, I sent a copy of the novelization of Snakes on a Plane off to crazymonk to review when he wasn’t busy working on the Nevada marijuana initiative. Well, he’s finished the book and wrote up his review (and he even made his own graphics… bonus).

Here’s the first full length review of the Snakes on a Plane novelization by Christa Faust (it’s long, so be sure to read past the break):

Review: Snakes on a Plane novelization by Christa Faust

Short Review


Both singular and plural versions were counted for “snakes” and “plane.” For “motherfucking,” one use of “motherfucker” was counted. The book is 405 pages in length, so there is on average almost one use of the word “snake” per page.

Read on for the full length “Long Review”:

Long Review

I’d warn you to beware of the spoilers in this review, but what can you say about a book whose very title sums up the entirety of its contents. It would be like calling the sixth book in the Harry Potter series Snape Kills Dumbledore. Trust me, there’s not much to spoil here.

But this is a review, so the question I’m supposed to tackle here is this: is Christa Faust’s novelization worth reading? The answer? Well, if you’re a snakesonaplaniac, yeah, but only for a few more weeks. It’s clear that Faust’s book wasn’t written with the Internet sensation in mind (especially since, as she said in her interview, she completed it before the buzz took off), so while the book succeeded in making me hunger to see it on the big screen, I doubt anyone would get much joy from it after the fact. Still, Faust has a knack for the pulp fiction, so if that’s your bag, dig in.

And now, I present to you the guide to Snakes on a Plane, the novelization:

    • pages 1-19: The set-up is quite mundane. Surfer boy Sean stumbles on Triad mobster killing someone with a baseball bat. Somehow, they find his house the next morning and try to kill him. Boring exposition. I hope the movie cuts quickly to the chase.
    • p.20: “Well over six feet tall, black and bald with a kind of infinite calm in his dark eyes…” Now we’re talking. SLJ saves Sean — who knows how he found him.
    • p.27: “planning”! So close. But still neither “snake,” nor “plane,” nor “motherfucking” has been used.
    • p.34: First use of the word “plane.”
    • p.61: First use of the word “snakes.” “Fuckin’” too, but not the maternal kind. The bad guys pretty much drive the crate of snakes onto the tarmac and load it onto the plane, pretending that they’re delivering orchids. I hope this book isn’t to the next terrorist attack as Tom Clancy’s Debt of Honor was to 9/11.
    • p.75 The planner of the snakes on a plane plan is told: “[T]here are those who feel that your chosen method for handling this problem is … uncertain.”
    • p.88 “Motherfucking!” But modifying neither snakes nor planes.
    • p.108 “reefer” is misspelled as “refer.” I’m getting the sense that they didn’t show this book to an editor.
    • p.121 The Yo Mama jokes Faust referred to in her interview. Mothers and fucking are mentioned, but no “motherfucking.”
    • p.131 The Mile High Club and the first snake attack.
    • p.179 First italicized use of the word “snake.” The second and third italicized uses follow on pages 209 and 226.
    • p.180 “Live snakes on the plane.” The first sentence using both words.
    • p.185 Woohoo! “snakes on a plane…”
    • Lots of people are being bitten, lots of people dying.
    • p.359 The line. Yes, SLJ’s special line.
    • End of the book: Sean, SLJ, and some passengers are safe, but the last eight pages of the book are a waste: no snakes.

Let’s sum things up. Lots of people are killed in a variety of ways, and likewise for the snakes. I’m particularly looking forward to when SLJ shoots a cobra with a spear gun. I’m not exactly sure how many people are killed in total, but I managed to keep track of all “onscreen” (read: explicitly described) non-reptilian deaths:

You will cry.

Appendix A: Top 13 Quotes, in order of appearance

  1. “They wouldn’t let poisonous snakes on a plane.” (185)
  2. “The snake didn’t argue, it just bit him.” (186)
  3. “A plane full of venomous snakes.” (193)
  4. “How could snakes have gotten onto the plane?” (194)
  5. “Snakes.” (226)
  6. “You have an unknown number of snakes loose on a plane.” (244)
  7. “Snakes on crack.” (250)
  8. “Why exactly… are there snakes on this plane?” (253)
  9. “Yo, we got us some dead snakes.” (255)
  10. “Airborne and terrified snakes flew through the air like deadly party streamers on New Years Eve in Hell, wrapping around necks and limbs and biting again and again.” (266)
  11. “Snake ate my radio.” (342)
  12. “I’ve had it with these motherfucking snakes on this motherfucking plane.” (359)
  13. “I hate those snakes!” (377)

Appendix B: All non-Latinate snake species mentioned, although not necessarily by virtue of being on the plane

    • Rattlesnake: (diamondback, black-banded timber, canebrake, Pacific rattler)
    • Boa Constrictor
    • Russell’s Viper
    • Horned Viper
    • Mozambique Spitting Cobra
    • Banded Krait
    • Albino Corn Snake
    • Cobra (monocellate)
    • Blackhead Bushmaster
    • Racer
    • Taipan (inland)
    • Copperhead
    • Ceylonese Palm Viper
    • Boomslang
    • Mamba (black, green)
    • Burmese Python
    • Death Adder
    • Madagascar Leaf Nosed Snake
    • Green Tree Boa
    • Puff Adder
    • Reticulated Python
    • Anaconda
    • Fer-de-lance
    • Terciopelo
    • Rhino Viper
    • Tiger Snake
    • Gopher Snake
    • King Cobra

crazymonk



35 Comments »

I read the book as well, I couldn’t resist. I actually bought it in a Dallas airport of all places. I thought it was fantastic.

Comment by mat1419 — July 10, 2006 @ 12:13 am

Good review

Comment by pepeeg — July 10, 2006 @ 2:36 am

Interesting that there doesn’t seem to be a gaboon viper on the plane in the book, but there’s one in the movie.

Comment by Ann — July 10, 2006 @ 3:01 am

Oh man A Gaboon viper is like the deadliest of them all!!!

Comment by Snakes in Europe — July 10, 2006 @ 3:14 am

Well, the gaboon viper is a puff adder, and puff adders were mentioned generically. And as I implied in the title of Appendix B, there were several species of snakes mentioned in the book by their scientific name in Latin. I chose not to include those, because nobody speaks Latin, silly scientists!

Comment by crazymonk — July 10, 2006 @ 3:32 am

erm…hello?…this book suggests the film will not not have full on snakes on a plane until about 70% in. So for over a hour we are going to have to watch some tedious build up. Its obvious they shot most of this film before the buzz started. I bet the writers really did think it could be a great story…bit like ‘deep blue sea…’

Comment by capone — July 10, 2006 @ 3:42 am

Sorry forgot to add…I honestly think the whole film will come down to a 20-30minute segment. Which is still good enough reason to watch it probably but still…I am now starting to rapidly lose faith.

Comment by capone — July 10, 2006 @ 3:44 am

Gaboons are actually the 16th most venomous. The #1 of all is a species of sea snake. On land, it’s the taipan. Gaboons do have the longest fangs of all snakes, though. Either way, it’s all academic when you’ve got one of them biting your ankle–whether it’s the most venomous or third most venomous doesn’t really matter. I mean, the venom of one king cobra bite is enough to kill a full-grown elephant or 20 adult humans. But you’re, you know, just one adult human…so whether it’s enough to kill 1 or 5 or 15 or 60, you’re still dead. Nice that there are some pythons on there, anyway–so it’s not all “Fangs for flying.”

Comment by Ann — July 10, 2006 @ 11:27 am

No, capone, there are full snakes on the plane before even the halfway point. The book spends a lot of time on character backstory that I imagine the film will avoid.

Comment by crazymonk — July 10, 2006 @ 11:54 am

You know whats deadlier than a sea snakes venom? My cat’s breath!

Comment by Snakes in Europe — July 10, 2006 @ 12:24 pm

That’s odd, my cat’s breath smells like cat food.

Comment by Snakes on a Blog — July 10, 2006 @ 12:25 pm

So…A cat seems to get it in the movie, and I assume the dog in the movie gets it, too, although I know they’ve tried to make the dog annoying. But doesn’t all that violate the “thou shalt not kill cute animals” rule of movies? It seems like the first reaction of everyone who saw the trailer with the cat scene was “KITTY!” And perhaps it will still be on our minds, even as we watch humans drop like flies. “Yes, the flight attendant’s dead…and that newborn baby…and all those nuns and orphans…but damnit, a KITTY!”

Comment by Ann — July 10, 2006 @ 1:34 pm

Actually, I haven’t read the book yet (it’s on its way from eBay), but it looked to me on the chart that that was a fetus, so we’re talking a PREGANANT WOMAN dying, not a newborn.

And the chart also showed a doggy, but not a kitty, so even though we see a snake crawl into a kitty-cat-carrier in the clip, do we actually SEE kitty bite the dust? A cat can take on a snake, don’t you think? I’d like to think so…?

Comment by Armitage112 — July 10, 2006 @ 2:04 pm

“PREGNANT”!!! DOH!! :-P

Comment by Armitage112 — July 10, 2006 @ 2:05 pm

Let’s just say… that’s one damn fiesty cat.

Comment by crazymonk — July 10, 2006 @ 2:38 pm

You know, I just don’t think you’re going to get the same enjoyment from reading the novel than from watching the movie. Motherfucker is just another curse without Sam Jackson yelling it!

Comment by Szin Dragon — July 10, 2006 @ 2:59 pm

A cat versus a snake? Depends on the snake. Yeah, a cat could take on a garter snake or whatnot. But a king cobra? Or a bushmaster? The snake just needs to get one good bite in, and it’s over. Anyway, from what little we see in that scene, it all seems wrong…it almost seems like too much of the snake is disappearing into the carrier. However, I have some real questions about when the pheromones are released in this. If the snake had no pheromonal “jumpstart” before seeing the cat, it wouldn’t have just slithered right in there as if it were nothing. If it had a jumpstart, I can’t see why all the snakes wouldn’t be attacking each other. I mean, you’re a snake, and you’re pissed off…and you see another snake coming by–competition, really. You’re going to kick his cloaca. I figure.

Comment by Ann — July 10, 2006 @ 6:38 pm

I’m almost done with this book and i’ll say i really have enjoyed it alot.

Comment by Cullen — July 10, 2006 @ 7:09 pm

The pheromones are released right before the snakes are put onto the plane. The snakes are released when an altimeter attached to the crate hits a certain altitude.

As for how the snakes react to the pheromones, the book’s explanation is that a snake expert has tailor-made the pheromone for this sort of situation.

Comment by crazymonk — July 10, 2006 @ 7:36 pm

[...] Snakes on a Blog has published my graphic-heavy review of the Snakes on a Plane novelization by Christa Faust. Here’s the short version of my review: [...]

Pingback by crazymonk.org » Snakes on a Plane novelization review | not the great american blog — July 10, 2006 @ 8:25 pm

To the Fans of SNAKES; I have not read the book but I can assure u Snakes appear in the first 15 min of the movie before that there are two action sequences to keep u entertained. I would not let u down like that… All the Best David R. Ellis

Comment by DAVID R. ELLIS — July 11, 2006 @ 8:12 am

To Capone; don’t loose faith so easily believe in Snakes. After the first 2 action sequences in the opening, Snakes appear about 15 min in. After that it is a non stop thrill ride that doesn’t let go for the next hour and 20 min. If you don’t have a great time and enjoy it I will pay u back for your ticket. David R. Ellis

Comment by DAVID R. ELLIS — July 11, 2006 @ 8:17 am

glad to hear it Mr Ellis, sir! thanks for setting the record straight.

Comment by Betty Swallocks — July 11, 2006 @ 11:04 am

Well, if the book was the movie, p.61 of p.405 would be about 14 minutes in, assuming that the movie is 95 minutes long (as Ellis implied) and that the timing of pages is consistent.

So in other words, the book is no different than the movie. And while 14 minutes or 60 short pages should only bother the impatient, two action scenes without snakes is, for some, two action scenes too many!

Comment by crazymonk — July 11, 2006 @ 11:36 am

I’d be gravely concerned about anyone who couldn’t wait for 14 minutes to see some snakes. I have this image of them in the theater, shaking and swearing staring at their watch: “13:57 …13:59 …14:00 …14:02 …god, where are the snakes? …14:05 …oh man …I need my fix …” To those people, I would say, “You’ve got snakes on the *brain*.” But back to the pheromones…can humans smell that?

Comment by Ann — July 11, 2006 @ 1:12 pm

“Actually, I haven’t read the book yet (it’s on its way from eBay), but it looked to me on the chart that that was a fetus, so we’re talking a PREGANANT WOMAN dying, not a newborn.”

I noticed that, too…at first, I thought maybe he just needed a quick shot of a baby to put in the image, but how hard is it to find a picture of a baby? If he doesn’t want to use a real one (not that babies could be identified by their looks, let’s face it), he could use a graphic. So…is it a pregnant woman? And…OK, I know I’m going to get a lot of flak for this, but wouldn’t the baby be counted with the other human deaths? *runs away*

Comment by Ann — July 11, 2006 @ 1:18 pm

“Motherfuckin snake ate that motherfuckin’ cat!”

Comment by Jim — July 11, 2006 @ 2:36 pm

“OK, I know I’m going to get a lot of flak for this, but wouldn’t the baby be counted with the other human deaths?”

Ann, I’m guessing crazymonk wasn’t intending to wade into politically treacherous waters with his infographic. I applaud his victim-identifying precision.

Comment by Figz — July 11, 2006 @ 2:55 pm

OK, to clarify:

It is a pregnant woman who is killed, and the description is rather graphic. First it describes the woman’s death, and then, after she dies, it describes the death of the fetus in the womb several seconds later. I hope the movie zooms into her belly, a la Fight Club.

Comment by crazymonk — July 11, 2006 @ 3:01 pm

Touche’, yes. I mean, I grant that it should be noted, as it’s different. I mean, if a snake bit a conjoined twin, it’d kill both of them. And even though they are 2 people, it’d still need to be noted for clarity’s sake that it was a conjoined twin killing–i.e., 1 attack that killed 2 people. The same goes for our poor little unborn baby. “Those motherfuckin’ snakes killed that motherfuckin’ fetus!”

Comment by Ann — July 11, 2006 @ 5:28 pm

“I noticed that, too…at first, I thought maybe he just needed a quick shot of a baby to put in the image, but how hard is it to find a picture of a baby?”

That’s why I commented on the PREGNANT woman (not “PREGANANT” :-p lol)–I figured a highly-intelligent person such as crazymonk would use a baby if he meant an infant that someone would put in a seat that would spend most of the flight crying–in which cases, some sickos might actually root for the snake. ;-) This way, the unborn child hasn’t offended anyone, making his/her death even more tragic. :-(

“I’m guessing crazymonk wasn’t intending to wade into politically treacherous waters with his infographic. I applaud his victim-identifying precision.”

As do I–very astute observation on your part, Figz.

“I hope the movie zooms into her belly, a la Fight Club.”

OK–I’m sorry, but now THAT’s pushing it. That’s worse than the puppy and/or kitty. :-( I hope that’s the snake SLJ takes and beat over the chair repeatedly, and I hope he does it until its head splats like a bug on a windshield.

Comment by Armitage112 — July 11, 2006 @ 9:26 pm

I heard that, during the climax of the film, the unborn child actually emerges from his dead mother’s womb and saves Samuel L. Jackson’s life in a noble action in which he/it sacrifices his/its own life.

I call the unborn baby “it” because, see, it doesn’t totally emerge from its mother’s womb when it’s saving Samuel L. Jackson - it leaves its left pinky toe within its mother’s uterus. So technically it’s an unborn child, which means that pro-choice viewers will not find this death scene tragic, I mean, it’s not like it was a baby, it still had its toe inside.

Comment by IQpierce — July 12, 2006 @ 11:24 am

I’m sorry but 5 instances of motherfucking/er in 405 pages??! This is not an accurate depiction of the movie at all! I read the first sentence in the book store and put it right back on the shelf. I want to learn about the details when I see the actual movie, maybe then I will read the book, but it’s unlikely.

Comment by Matthew Boehm — July 15, 2006 @ 11:16 pm

[...] This weekend I will be attending Comic-Con 2006 in San Diego. There, with some fellow bloggers, I will be participating in (closed-door) round table discussions with three people involved with Snakes on a Plane: Jules Sylvester (a snake handler), David Ellis (the director), and Samuel Jackson (bad-ass motherfucker). I guess they liked my review of the novelization. (Oh, and being friends with Brian doesn’t hurt.) [...]

Pingback by crazymonk.org » Comic-Con 2006 | not the great american blog — July 18, 2006 @ 10:05 pm

[...] Who does those punks up in Cambridge think they are? I used to live right next door to them, so they should know that reviewing novelizations of Snakes on a Plane is my thing. They’re treading on my toes. Here’s their (negative) review. [...]

Pingback by Snakes on a Blog » Snakes on an MIT Novelization Review — August 5, 2006 @ 9:03 pm


Leave a comment

Snakes on a What?
Snakes on a Blog documents my quest to attend the Hollywood premiere of Snakes on a Plane. If I'm really lucky, this blog will do more than just document the quest, it will aid it. Read my first and second pleas.

If you want to learn more about Snakes on a Plane, start at the beginning of January and read up.

Search

 
countdown


Quotes
"See, I will send venomous snakes among you, vipers that cannot be charmed, and they will bite you..."
                 - Jeremiah 8:17

"That's great, it starts with an earthquake, birds and snakes, an aeroplane..."
                 - Michael Stipe, REM

"Enough is enough, I've had it with these snakes."
                 - Samuel L. Jackson